One swab from the surface of your smartphone can tell scientists all about your lifestyle

This article was first published in the Washington Post, but I read it in the Denver post several days later. Though the article I read did not mention how our finger prints might reveal our password, that's what I thought of immediately, not that we leave chemicals behind which can tell the story of our lifestyle.

I should imagine this is analysis way too expensive to use in every day crimes.

So why do I include this in my blog? Not sure really. Just I guess as another tool with DNA for crime and how we leave our mark on the world.

I found this article here.

Just how dirty is the typical smartphone? Dirty enough that a sample swab from the surface of a phone can accurately predict people’s lifestyle choices, all the way down to how much beer they drink, a new study suggests.

The study, conducted by researchers at the University of California at San Diego School of Medicine and the Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, uses chemical analysis from molecules lingering on phones to determine basic lifestyle choices of the owner. Personal routine clues such as diet, cosmetic or makeup use, clothing, and medication could be gleaned from the wide-reaching analysis, as well as environmental clues such as ocean and sunscreen molecules that could point toward locations the owner recently visited.

The method draws on an understanding that the outermost layer of human skin carries chemical components drastically affected by the body’s inner chemistry and external, environmental factors. Researchers were able to capture the skin molecules present on these personal items and match them to a vast array of environmental and biological factors, quickly processing and crosschecking databases using a supercomputer.

Some of the molecules found on phone surfaces had lingered for some time. Researchers found traces of DEET on one participant’s phone even though that person had applied the mosquito repellent nearly five months before the study.

“We thought about what objects that we most frequently interact with that has the highest chance of demonstrating our proof of principle, that so much could be determined from a sample of these molecules,” Dorrestein said. “The phone is very obvious. Most of us spend so much time on our phones, so there are lots of molecules from your hands being transferred to the object itself at all times.”

Dorrestein and Bouslimani say the applications of this type of broad chemical analysis are vast. They cited possible medical applications that monitor the effect of medication on a patient. The effects of using cosmetics and skin-care products can also be monitored. They also mentioned potential law enforcement uses, where officials could analyze samples from phones, car keys, handbags or other personal items left at a crime scene to determine the profile of a suspect.

But just how different is this method from other means of collecting chemical data? For example, medication effectiveness can be measured through blood samples. On the law enforcement side, police officers already have access to forensic analysis tools that can determine the presence of illegal drugs or explosives on objects found at crime scenes, and the addition of lifestyle information might not be particularly useful to narrowing down a subject.

“The problem is [these lifestyle profiles] are not very discriminating things — if you were to find a particular brand of cosmetic it is not really going to narrow down for you who you would be looking for,” said John Bond, an associate professor in criminology at the University of Leicester in an interview with the Guardian.

But Dorrestein claims that the full profile of information gleaned from these samples, rather than targeted analysis of traces of illegal drugs, for example, makes the methodology useful to law enforcement. “The hardware that is used are not any different than what the FBI uses,” Dorrestein said. “It’s the thought process of the data that comes out. We can learn more from this swab than just an illicit molecule from this information. We can actually learn about the lifestyle of an individual.”

By Karen Turner, The Washington Post